Most leaders know who on their team isn’t performing. They’ve known for a while. The conversation hasn’t happened because it’s uncomfortable, or because the timing never feels right, or because there’s a quiet hope that things will improve on their own. They rarely do.
What makes it harder is when there are no real consequences attached to the underperformance – no structure, no clear expectation set at the outset, no moment where someone heard plainly what good actually looks like. When the standard was never made explicit, the eventual conversation lands like an ambush, and the leader senses that coming. So, they wait. Avoiding the discussion has the feel of keeping the peace. All it really does is push the cost down the road, where it compounds the longer it sits.
The people who carry that cost first are the ones doing the work properly. They pick up the slack. They notice who doesn’t, and they watch to see whether it registers with anyone above them. Every week the conversation doesn’t happen, they learn a little more about how seriously the standard is actually held. How a leader handles underperformance gets read by the whole team long before a word is said out loud.
This is why the language of “being tough” tends to miss the mark. Accountability done well begins long before the difficult meeting. It begins with an expectation set clearly enough that no one is blindsided later, a structure that makes performance visible, and a willingness to have the smaller conversation early rather than the much larger one months on. Leaders who find these conversations brutal are often the ones who skipped that groundwork and are now trying to undo a year of drift in a single sitting.
In my experience, when an underperforming team member is finally held to account, the rest of the team rarely thinks “that’s unfair.” They think “why did that take so long?” That reaction is worth sitting with. The accountability a leader puts off in the name of protecting morale is frequently the very thing their strongest people have been waiting for.
If you lead a team, it’s worth asking which conversation you’re currently postponing – and what the waiting is costing you.
Our LTT peer groups are the perfect forum for leaders who want to learn from the experience of other leaders, and make better, stronger decisions.
Contact us for the opportunity of attending one of our group sessions as a guest.